# Any official position on the use of AI? **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [April 11, 2026, 5:08pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/any-official-position-on-the-use-of-ai/5039 "2026-04-11T17:08:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 13
**Author:** ![hpk](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/hpk/32/9_2.png) [@hpk](https://forum.delta.chat/u/hpk)\ **Post date:** [April 13, 2026, 11:58am UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/any-official-position-on-the-use-of-ai/5039/13 "2026-04-13T11:58:58Z")
There is no official position on LLM tooling or LLM-assisted contributions but several discussions between various contributors, across a wide spectrum of opinions. **What is pretty clear already, is that unlike with WhatsApp or Telegram or Firefox, Delta Chat keeps it like Signal: avoid any “AI” integration on the user side, on what runs in Apps.**** What is also pretty clear that random LLM-generated contributions are quickly closed.** While the question of LLM usage might be the most important in FOSS hacker circles and among rightfully concerned ecosystem-citizens, our project efforts are dealing with supporting users and communities in real-life emergencies, who are otherwise blocked from private communication. Moreover, many contributors are currently busy co-ordinating important bug-fix follow up releases after the 2.48 monster release. That being said, there will likely be public statements from the “deltachat” project during 2026 about LLM-usage, when we get to internally discuss it more. Which is maybe similar to how Debian concluded for now with “not deciding right now about LLM”: [Debian decides not to decide on AI-generated contributions [LWN.net]](https://lwn.net/Articles/1061544/) Thanks for any patience you might have with us 🙂 --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.delta.chat/t/any-official-position-on-the-use-of-ai/5039)._