# Add support of Call 📞 in Group

**URL:** <https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149>\
**Category:** Feature Proposal\
**Tags:** calls\
**Created:** [May 1, 2026, 1:31pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149 "2026-05-01T13:31:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saeid008](https://forum.delta.chat/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@saeid008](https://forum.delta.chat/u/saeid008)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2026, 1:31pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/1 "2026-05-01T13:31:57Z")

</div>

Hello Delta chat team. As call 📞 is available in private message(DM), may I ask you to enable voice/video call in group too? So 4 or 5 people can join call? Thanks.

## Expected behavior

## Actual behavior

## Example Images

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/wofwca/32/1702_2.png) [@WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/u/WofWca)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2026, 5:37pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/2 "2026-05-01T17:37:52Z")

</div>

I agree that this should be possible.  
However it’s not simply a matter of flipping the switch. Implementing group calls is quite a bit harder than implementing 1:1 calls.

## Workarounds

- Use third-party services such as Jitsi
- On #desktop it’s possible to have multiple 1:1 calls at the same time. Just make all participants call each other.

## My thoughts on implementation

It’s about time to switch to an existing implementation, such as Jitsi or something PeerJS-based. Then it’s gonna be only a matter of implementing the signaling protocol in Core (over email).  
Edit: I made a separate topic for this: [How to implement group calls: integrate Jitsi or something](https://support.delta.chat/t/how-to-implement-group-calls-integrate-jitsi-or-something/5464)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erfan](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/erfan/32/3386_2.png) [@Erfan](https://forum.delta.chat/u/Erfan)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 10:14am UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/3 "2026-05-03T10:14:59Z")

</div>

Wouldn’t it be better if this feature were implemented as a mini app? that way group voice calls could be handled there instead of being built directly into the core.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/wofwca/32/1702_2.png) [@WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/u/WofWca)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 11:05am UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/4 "2026-05-03T11:05:57Z")

</div>

With how WebXDC is currently implemented this is not quite possible. WebRTC, which calls rely on, is still disabled for WebXDC apps.  
Plus we’d at least need some ringing notification API.  
Edit: and give access to camera [Allow access to camera, geolocation, other Web APIs](https://support.delta.chat/t/allow-access-to-camera-geolocation-other-web-apis/2446).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saeid008](https://forum.delta.chat/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@saeid008](https://forum.delta.chat/u/saeid008)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 5:21pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/5 "2026-05-03T17:21:59Z")

</div>

That makes sense, thanks for the detailed explanation.

If WebRTC isn’t available in WebXDC yet, then integrating something like Jitsi or a PeerJS-based solution in the core sounds like a reasonable direction. Even a basic group call (like small groups, no advanced features) could already be very useful as a first step.

Also, maybe starting with a simple signaling approach over email, as you mentioned, could help test things without too much complexity upfront.

In the meantime, I guess Jitsi is the most practical workaround, but it would definitely be nice to have something native in Delta Chat eventually.

Happy to help test if something experimental comes up 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ian](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/ian/32/3164_2.png) [@ian](https://forum.delta.chat/u/ian)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 9:02pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/6 "2026-05-03T21:02:42Z")

</div>

Instead of WebRTC, xdc realtime P2P could be used for group calls. It could already work if we had access to multimedia API:

> [@I made a video call app (WITHOUT 15-second ping this time)](https://support.delta.chat/t/i-made-a-video-call-app-without-15-second-ping-this-time/3155/1):
>
> The long-awaited sequel to [Download webxdc-video-call.xdc](https://github.com/WofWca/webxdc-video-call/releases/latest/download/webxdc-video-call.xdc)[Source code (with updated README)](https://github.com/WofWca/webxdc-video-call/) What’s changed is that now it uses the recently added [webxdc real-time P2P channels](https://webxdc.org/docs/spec/joinRealtimeChannel.html), so now there is no 15-second delay (now it’s around 1 second), and you can actually do calls over it because of that (but remember that it’s still just a prototype). Usage: Enable “Realtime Webxdc Channels” in Delta Chat advanced settings. (it’s already enabled by default after the 1.48 release). Refer to [“Usage”…](https://support.delta.chat/t/i-made-a-video-call-app-with-15-second-ping/2800#usage-1)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/wofwca/32/1702_2.png) [@WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/u/WofWca)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2026, 9:16am UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/7 "2026-05-04T09:16:54Z")

</div>

> [@ian](#):
>
> xdc realtime P2P could be used for group calls

While it is possible, handling media manually is way inferior to using WebRTC. To name a few things: WebRTC supports adaptive media quality and jitter buffering out of the box. We really shouldn’t be reinventing the wheel here.  
Edit: also see [WEBXDC Audio Conferences](https://support.delta.chat/t/webxdc-audio-conferences/3818).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saeid008](https://forum.delta.chat/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@saeid008](https://forum.delta.chat/u/saeid008)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2026, 5:09pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/8 "2026-05-04T17:09:43Z")

</div>

> [@WofWca](#):
>
> While it is possible, handling media manually is way inferior to using WebRTC. To name a few things: WebRTC supports adaptive media quality and jitter buffering out of the box. We really shouldn’t be reinventing the wheel here.

Interesting points.

Using realtime P2P in webxdc sounds like a clever workaround and it’s impressive that it already gets latency down to ~1 second. That said, I also see the concern about reinventing the wheel—things like adaptive bitrate, jitter buffering, echo cancellation, etc. are pretty hard to get right without WebRTC.

Maybe the P2P approach could still be useful as an experimental step or prototype, while waiting for proper WebRTC support (either in core or eventually in WebXDC)? It could help explore UX and basic group call flows without committing to a full implementation yet.

Curious to see which direction the project leans toward 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Low](https://forum.delta.chat/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/ecae2f/32.png) [@Low](https://forum.delta.chat/u/Low)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2026, 6:29pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/9 "2026-06-07T18:29:21Z")

</div>

> [@Erfan](#):
>
> Wouldn’t it be better if this feature were implemented as a mini app

I don’t think primary functions should be pushed into mini apps. Keep the mini apps just for more niche use cases that require data to be structured in particular ways.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adbenitez](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/adbenitez/32/2323_2.png) [@adbenitez](https://forum.delta.chat/u/adbenitez)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2026, 6:14pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/10 "2026-06-15T18:14:52Z")

</div>

having to send a mini-app to call the family chat is way too complicated and nerd, we are aiming to make something that is easy to use by the masses

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Low](https://forum.delta.chat/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/ecae2f/32.png) [@Low](https://forum.delta.chat/u/Low)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2026, 7:54pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/11 "2026-06-22T19:54:44Z")

</div>

What is the blocker for group video / group call right now?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/wofwca/32/1702_2.png) [@WofWca](https://forum.delta.chat/u/WofWca)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2026, 7:01am UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/12 "2026-06-23T07:01:08Z")

</div>

There are no blockers, I believe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Low](https://forum.delta.chat/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/ecae2f/32.png) [@Low](https://forum.delta.chat/u/Low)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2026, 5:45pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/13 "2026-06-23T17:45:43Z")

</div>

Would be a very easy win for families with mixed iOS and Android users. Right now, we don’t have a solution. Some people use iPads so we can all use FaceTime still. Feels very silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adbenitez](https://forum.delta.chat/user_avatar/forum.delta.chat/adbenitez/32/2323_2.png) [@adbenitez](https://forum.delta.chat/u/adbenitez)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2026, 3:18pm UTC](https://forum.delta.chat/t/add-support-of-call-in-group/5149/14 "2026-06-30T15:18:18Z")

</div>

well the work that needs to be done for it to work in all clients/platforms is the blocker 😉
